Maco Supply Corp. v. Masciarelli

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Maco Supply Corp. v. Masciarelli

223 So. 2d 790, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5738

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 25, 1969

DocketNo. 67-984

StatusPublished

This text of 223 So. 2d 790 (Maco Supply Corp. v. Masciarelli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Maco Supply Corp. v. Masciarelli, 223 So. 2d 790, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5738 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on August 13, 1968 (213 So.2d 265) affirming in part and reversing in part the judgment of the Circuit Court of Dade County, in the above styled cause; and

Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida by its opinion and judgment filed April 30, 1969 (224 So.2d 329) and mandate now lodged in this court affirmed in part and quashed in part this court’s judgment;

Now, therefore, It is Ordered that the mandate of this court heretofore issued in this cause on September 6, 1968 is withdrawn, the opinion and judgment of this court filed August 13, 1968, insofar as it is in conflict with or fails to conform to the views expressed in the opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida dated April 30, 1969, aforesaid, is withdrawn and vacated, and the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court. The opinion and judgment of this court except as withdrawn and vacated, as aforesaid, is adhered to, the judgment of the circuit court appealed from is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings not inconsistent with the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida and this court. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the trial court (Rule 3.16(b) Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A.).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER ON MANDATE

PER CURIAM.

Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on August 13, 1968 (213 So.2d 265) affirming in part and reversing in part the judgment of the Circuit Court of Dade County, in the above styled cause; and

Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida by its opinion and judgment filed April 30, 1969 (224 So.2d 329) and mandate now lodged in this court affirmed in part and quashed in part this court’s judgment;

Now, therefore, It is Ordered that the mandate of this court heretofore issued in this cause on September 6, 1968 is withdrawn, the opinion and judgment of this court filed August 13, 1968, insofar as it is in conflict with or fails to conform to the views expressed in the opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida dated April 30, 1969, aforesaid, is withdrawn and vacated, and the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida is herewith made the opinion and judgment of this court. The opinion and judgment of this court except as withdrawn and vacated, as aforesaid, is adhered to, the judgment of the circuit court appealed from is reversed, and the cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings not inconsistent with the said opinion and judgment of the Supreme Court of Florida and this court. Costs allowed shall be taxed in the trial court (Rule 3.16(b) Florida Appellate Rules, 32 F.S.A.).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

223 So. 2d 790, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5738, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maco-supply-corp-v-masciarelli-fladistctapp-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack