MacNamara v. Roemmelt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

MacNamara v. Roemmelt

246 A.D. 669

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1935·Published

Opinion

Appeal from judgment entered on the jury’s verdict in favor of plaintiff and the order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial. The action was for personal injuries resulting from an automobile accident. The appellant complains that the respondent had an excessive verdict as the result of prejudicial remarks of her attorney on summation. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ., concur; Crapser, J., dissents and votes to reverse and to grant a new trial in the interests of justice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from judgment entered on the jury’s verdict in favor of plaintiff and the order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial. The action was for personal injuries resulting from an automobile accident. The appellant complains that the respondent had an excessive verdict as the result of prejudicial remarks of her attorney on summation. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ., concur; Crapser, J., dissents and votes to reverse and to grant a new trial in the interests of justice.

MacNamara v. Roemmelt, 246 A.D. 669 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

246 A.D. 669 (MacNamara v. Roemmelt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.