MacNamara v. Roemmelt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

MacNamara v. Roemmelt

246 A.D. 669

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1935

StatusPublished

This text of 246 A.D. 669 (MacNamara v. Roemmelt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

MacNamara v. Roemmelt, 246 A.D. 669 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from judgment entered on the jury’s verdict in favor of plaintiff and the order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial. The action was for personal injuries resulting from an automobile accident. The appellant complains that the respondent had an excessive verdict as the result of prejudicial remarks of her attorney on summation. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ., concur; Crapser, J., dissents and votes to reverse and to grant a new trial in the interests of justice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from judgment entered on the jury’s verdict in favor of plaintiff and the order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial. The action was for personal injuries resulting from an automobile accident. The appellant complains that the respondent had an excessive verdict as the result of prejudicial remarks of her attorney on summation. Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. Hill, P. J., Rhodes, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ., concur; Crapser, J., dissents and votes to reverse and to grant a new trial in the interests of justice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

246 A.D. 669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/macnamara-v-roemmelt-nyappdiv-1935.