MacMillan Co. v. Stewart

54 A. 240, 69 N.J.L. 212, 40 Vroom 212, 1903 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 182
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedFebruary 24, 1903
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 54 A. 240 (MacMillan Co. v. Stewart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MacMillan Co. v. Stewart, 54 A. 240, 69 N.J.L. 212, 40 Vroom 212, 1903 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 182 (N.J. 1903).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Garretson, J.

It appeared, prima facie, in the case that the plaintiff was a corporation. The defendant made a contract'with it.. He negotiated with it as to the discontinuance of a former suit upon the same contract, and agreed to pay the balance then due. He went to trial without notifying the defendant in 'any way, by plea or otherwise, that its corporate existence would be disputed. Star Bride Co. v. Ridsdale, 7 Vroom 229. It further appeared that the plaintiff was a foreign corporation; that the contract sued on was made in New York, and was a single transaction with the defendant.

The plaintiff was not bound in such case to comply with the provisions of the Corporation act requiring it to file a certificate in this state, and was competent to bring this action. Faxon Co. v. Lovett Co., 31 Vroom 128.

The plaintiff offered in evidence its books of account, and proved them by its cashier, who testified that he knew all about them, and also produced the original contract or order, which. the defendant admitted was signed by him. The plaintiff also proved that it had previously begun a suit upon the same contract, which had been withdrawn at the request of the defendant, he agreeing to pay the costs of that suit, as well as the balance due on the contract, and had made one payment after the suit was discontinued. The motion to nonsuit was properly denied. The defendant offered no evidence.

The judgment will be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Federal Schools, Inc. v. Sidden
188 A. 446 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 A. 240, 69 N.J.L. 212, 40 Vroom 212, 1903 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/macmillan-co-v-stewart-nj-1903.