MacManus v. Gertz
8 R.I. Dec. 260
This text of 8 R.I. Dec. 260 (MacManus v. Gertz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
MacManus v. Gertz, 8 R.I. Dec. 260 (R.I. Ct. App. 1932).
Opinion
Motion for a new trial filed by tbe defendant after a verdict for the plaintiff for $3,560.95 in an action for negligence.
The defendant concedes that the verdict is not against the evidence on either the issue of due care of the plaintiff or the negligence of the defendant and that the damages awarded are not excessive.
Motion for a new trial is hereby denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
8 R.I. Dec. 260, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/macmanus-v-gertz-risuperct-1932.