MacLeod v. Walter J. Satterthwait, Inc.
166 A. 163, 113 N.J. Eq. 238, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 1008
Opinion
The facts in this case correspond substantially to those presented in the case of Domestic Electric Corp. v. Mezzaluna, 109 N. J. Law 574, and for the reasons expressed in the opinion filed in that case the decree of the court below is affirmed.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Kays, Heteield, JJ. 8.
For reversal — Bodine, Heher, Van Buskirk, Dear, Wells, JJ. 5.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
MacLeod v. Walter J. Satterthwait, Inc., 166 A. 163, 113 N.J. Eq. 238, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 1008 (N.J. 1933).
166 A. 163 (MacLeod v. Walter J. Satterthwait, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fahmie v. Nyman
175 A.2d 438 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1961)
In re Herold
57 F. Supp. 359 (D. New Jersey, 1943)
Mugler Auto Pit Co. v. Tide Water Oil Co.
185 A. 542 (U.S. District Court, 1936)