MacLean v. Dhs
This text of MacLean v. Dhs (MacLean v. Dhs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
ROBERT J. MACLEAN, Petitioner
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, Respondent ______________________
2018-1037 ______________________
Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. SF-0752-06-0611-A-1. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
THAD MCINTOSH GUYER, T.M. Guyer & Friends, PC, Medford, OR, argued for petitioner.
ZACHARY JOHN SULLIVAN, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for respondent. Also represented by MARTIN F. HOCKEY, JR., ROBERT EDWARD KIRSCHMAN, JR., CHAD A. READLER. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE and TARANTO, Circuit Judges). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
October 5, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
MacLean v. Dhs, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maclean-v-dhs-cafc-2018.