MacLauchlan v. Behre

234 A.D. 714

This text of 234 A.D. 714 (MacLauchlan v. Behre) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MacLauchlan v. Behre, 234 A.D. 714 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Opinion

Order denying motion to strike cause from the Equity Term calendar reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The amended complaint presents no ease for an accounting in equity. The parties are not coadventurers, but the contract is simply one employing plaintiff and compensating him for his services by a share in the profits. (Hart v. Garrett Co., 87 App. Div. 536; Lee v. Washburn, 80 id. 410.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hart v. L. D. Garrett Co.
87 A.D. 536 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
234 A.D. 714, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/maclauchlan-v-behre-nyappdiv-1931.