Macksoud v. Dildarian
This text of 93 N.Y.S. 382 (Macksoud v. Dildarian) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The complaint, which is for goods sold and delivered, contains no allegation either of the value or the agreed price, if any, at which they were sold. The reference made to a bill of particulars attached to the complaint, in which, it is alleged, are “detailed certain payments,” presumably made upon the alleged sale and delivery, does not amount to any allegation of value. Plaintiff apparently appreciated the obvious infirmity of the complaint, in moving for an amendment thereof when he was made aware of the grounds of the demurrer. For some unexplained reason, however, plaintiff took his chances upon the demurrer, and did not press his application for an amendment. The complaint is so clearly defective in omitting the allegations indicated that the demurrer to its insufficiency should have been sustained.
The interlocutory and.final judgments are reversed, with costs, with leave to plaintiff to amend his complaint within six days upon payment of costs. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
93 N.Y.S. 382, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/macksoud-v-dildarian-nyappterm-1905.