Mackney v. State
This text of 262 A.D. 1063 (Mackney v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. All concur, except Dowling, J., who dissents and votes for reversal and for granting a judgment for claimants in the amount of the damages as fixed by the findings of the Court of Claims. (See Feinman v. Rubenstein, 264 N. Y. 662.) (The judgment dismisses a claim for damages for negligence in maintenance of a fence along a footpath in Beaver Island State Park on Grand Island.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
262 A.D. 1063, 30 N.Y.S.2d 704, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mackney-v-state-nyappdiv-1941.