Mackney v. State
262 A.D. 1063, 30 N.Y.S.2d 704, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7217
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 1, 1941·No. Claim No. 25530·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. All concur, except Dowling, J., who dissents and votes for reversal and for granting a judgment for claimants in the amount of the damages as fixed by the findings of the Court of Claims. (See Feinman v. Rubenstein, 264 N. Y. 662.) (The judgment dismisses a claim for damages for negligence in maintenance of a fence along a footpath in Beaver Island State Park on Grand Island.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mackney v. State, 262 A.D. 1063, 30 N.Y.S.2d 704, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7217 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).
262 A.D. 1063 (Mackney v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Valenza v. State
14 Misc. 2d 128 (New York State Court of Claims, 1942)