MacKlin v. Ruth

4 Del. 87
Superior Court of Delaware·Decided July 5, 1843·Published

Opinion

The Court

thought there was no analogy between this case and the one cited of an action on a promissory note, which is of itself evidence of the debt, and therefore, its production necessary. But this is an action on a bond with a collateral condition; which, if produced, would have no effect in proving or disproving the matter now to be tried, which is the amount of damages occasioned by breach of the condition of the bond. This breach must be proved independently of the bond; the existence of which is admitted by the judgment by default, which admits a cause of action; to what amount must be the subject of proof.

The jury made and returned an inquisition in the case, assessing the damages and costs at $529 61.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MacKlin v. Ruth, 4 Del. 87 (Del. Ct. App. 1843).

4 Del. 87 (MacKlin v. Ruth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.