Macklin v. Powell

107 A.D.2d 964, 484 N.Y.S.2d 377, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49850
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 24, 1985·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

— Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term (Kahn, J.), entered November 15, 1983 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to compel respondents to reinstate petitioner to his position in the Human Resources Management Group of the State Department of Health or, in the alternative, to afford petitioner a hearing.

Petitioner asserts (1) that his termination was arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion and effectuated in bad faith, and (2) that the officer who discharged him acted without authority. Special Term dismissed the petition in this CPLR article 78 proceeding. We concur with that decision.

A probationary employee may be terminated without reasons and without a hearing (De Salvo v Kolb, 54 AD2d 991). Our review of such termination is limited to an inquiry as to whether it was made in bad faith and was, therefore, arbitrary and capricious (Matter of King v Sapier, 47 AD2d 114, affd 38 NY2d 960). The burden of proof in that regard is upon petitioner. Petitioner has failed to meet that burden. The record discloses [965] that petitioner’s performance was marginal on his first evaluation and that more serious deficiencies surfaced later. His second evaluation indicated inadequate management, supervisory and interpersonal skills, all of which were necessary to the successful discharge of the duties of his position. Although petitioner had been advised of the dissatisfaction with his performance, nonetheless, his work effort and product continued to decline. He was, therefore, terminated. On this record, we cannot say that petitioner’s termination was arbitrary and capricious and made in bad faith. We find no merit, as well, to petitioner’s challenge to the authority of the officer who terminated him.

Judgment affirmed, without costs. Mahoney, P. J., Casey, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Macklin v. Powell, 107 A.D.2d 964, 484 N.Y.S.2d 377, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 49850 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

107 A.D.2d 964 (Macklin v. Powell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis v. New York State Division of Military & Naval Affairs
291 A.D.2d 778 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Munich v. City of Lackawanna Department of Public Safety
262 A.D.2d 959 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Saulpaugh v. Diehl
148 A.D.2d 928 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Van Dyke v. New York State Department of Education
144 A.D.2d 85 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Jessamy v. Fernandes
145 A.D.2d 486 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Sepulveda v. Long Island State Park & Recreation Commission
123 A.D.2d 703 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Velger v. Williams
118 A.D.2d 1037 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)