Mackin Med. v. Lindquist & Vennum
This text of Mackin Med. v. Lindquist & Vennum (Mackin Med. v. Lindquist & Vennum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT
MACKIN MEDICAL, INC., : No. 221 EAL 2020 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : LINDQUIST & VENNUM LLP D/B/A : LINDQUIST & VENNUM D/B/A LINDQUIST : & VENNUM P.L.L.P.; MARK A. JACOBSON, : ESQUIRE; MARK PRIVRATSKY, : ESQUIRE; CHRISTOPHER SMITH, : ESQUIRE; BALLARD SPAHR ANDREWS & : INGERSOLL LLP D/B/A BALLARD SPAHR, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 30th day of December, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal
is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Mackin Med. v. Lindquist & Vennum, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mackin-med-v-lindquist-vennum-pa-2020.