Mackey v. State

219 So. 3d 1009, 2017 WL 2491608, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 8526
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 9, 2017·No. Case No. 5D17-133·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Tracey Mackey appeals the summary denial of his rule 3.850 motion. The claims raised in Mackey’s motion were facially insufficient. Rather than denying Mackey’s motion, the trial court should have allowed him sixty days to amend his motion. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(f)(2) (“If the motion is insufficient on its face, and the motion is timely filed under this rule, the court shall enter a nonfinal, nonappealable order allowing the defendant 60 days to amend the motion.”).

We reverse the trial court’s summary denial order and remand for the trial court to provide Mackey sixty days to amend his motion.

REVERSED and REMANDED with instructions.

COHEN, C.J., and EVANDER and ■ LAMBERT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mackey v. State, 219 So. 3d 1009, 2017 WL 2491608, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 8526 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

219 So. 3d 1009 (Mackey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Michael Edward Norman v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2026
Tracey Mackey v. State
251 So. 3d 355 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)