Mackey v. New York State Board of Parole

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mackey v. New York State Board of Parole

201 A.D.2d 565, 609 N.Y.S.2d 817, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1208

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 14, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 201 A.D.2d 565 (Mackey v. New York State Board of Parole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mackey v. New York State Board of Parole, 201 A.D.2d 565, 609 N.Y.S.2d 817, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1208 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York State Board of Parole, dated November 13, 1990, and affirmed on August 28, 1991, which, after a hearing, denied the petitioner parole, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Hillery, J.), entered October 31, 1991, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

[566]*566The petitioner’s contention that his right to due process was violated at his parole hearing is without merit. In addition, the petitioner has failed to show convincingly that the Parole Board did not consider all of the factors enumerated by statute. The Parole Board’s determination denying him parole is not subject to judicial review (see, Executive Law § 259-i [5]; Matter of Gonzalez v Rodriguez, 135 AD2d 633; Matter of Davis v New York State Div. of Parole, 114 AD2d 412). Thompson, J. P., Rosenblatt, Ritter, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the New York State Board of Parole, dated November 13, 1990, and affirmed on August 28, 1991, which, after a hearing, denied the petitioner parole, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Hillery, J.), entered October 31, 1991, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

[566]*566The petitioner’s contention that his right to due process was violated at his parole hearing is without merit. In addition, the petitioner has failed to show convincingly that the Parole Board did not consider all of the factors enumerated by statute. The Parole Board’s determination denying him parole is not subject to judicial review (see, Executive Law § 259-i [5]; Matter of Gonzalez v Rodriguez, 135 AD2d 633; Matter of Davis v New York State Div. of Parole, 114 AD2d 412). Thompson, J. P., Rosenblatt, Ritter, Friedmann and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

201 A.D.2d 565, 609 N.Y.S.2d 817, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mackey-v-new-york-state-board-of-parole-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack