MacKey v. McLarty

189 So. 832, 138 Fla. 632
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 16, 1939·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam. —

Writ of error brings for review judgment in favor of plaintiff in an action of ejectment.

Plaintiff in error has presented questions for our consideration but the questions appear to be based on assumptions which are not supported by the record. The real question presented by the record is simply whether or not the evidence is sufficient to support the judgment. It is.

A study of the record discloses no reversible error. So,, the judgment is affirmed.

So ordered.

*633 Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur. Whitfield, J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Justices Brown ,and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MacKey v. McLarty, 189 So. 832, 138 Fla. 632 (Fla. 1939).

189 So. 832 (MacKey v. McLarty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State-Wide Construction, Inc. v. Dowda
424 So. 2d 198 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)