MacKey v. McLarty

189 So. 832, 138 Fla. 632
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 16, 1939
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 189 So. 832 (MacKey v. McLarty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MacKey v. McLarty, 189 So. 832, 138 Fla. 632 (Fla. 1939).

Opinion

Per Curiam. —

Writ of error brings for review judgment in favor of plaintiff in an action of ejectment.

Plaintiff in error has presented questions for our consideration but the questions appear to be based on assumptions which are not supported by the record. The real question presented by the record is simply whether or not the evidence is sufficient to support the judgment. It is.

A study of the record discloses no reversible error. So,, the judgment is affirmed.

So ordered.

*633 Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur. Whitfield, J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Justices Brown ,and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State-Wide Construction, Inc. v. Dowda
424 So. 2d 198 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
189 So. 832, 138 Fla. 632, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mackey-v-mclarty-fla-1939.