Mackey v. Lanier Collection Agency & Service, Inc.
484 U.S. 809, 108 S. Ct. 58
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mackey v. Lanier Collection Agency & Service, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 486 U.S. 825 →
Opinion
Sup. Ct. Ga. [Certiorari granted, 483 U. S. 1004.] Maureen E. Mahoney, Esq., of Washington, D. C., a member of the Bar of this Court, is invited to brief and argue this case as amicus curiae in support of the judgment below. Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mackey v. Lanier Collection Agency & Service, Inc., 484 U.S. 809, 108 S. Ct. 58 (1987).
484 U.S. 809 (Mackey v. Lanier Collection Agency & Service, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.