Mackesy v. Maine
305 U.S. 570, 59 S. Ct. 230
Opinion
The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) Harding v. Illinois, 196 U. S. 78, 86, 87; Capital City Dairy Co. v. Ohio, 183 U. S. 238, 248; (2) Nash v. United States, 229 U. S. 373, 377; Whitney v. California, 274 U. S. 357, 368, 369; Carter v. Texas, ante, p. 557.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mackesy v. Maine, 305 U.S. 570, 59 S. Ct. 230 (1938).
305 U.S. 570 (Mackesy v. Maine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Capital City Dairy Co. v. Ohio
183 U.S. 238 (Supreme Court, 1902)
Harding v. Illinois
196 U.S. 78 (Supreme Court, 1904)
Nash v. United States
229 U.S. 373 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Whitney v. California
274 U.S. 357 (Supreme Court, 1927)