MACKENZIE BROWN V. STATE OF ARIZONA

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in MACKENZIE BROWN V. STATE OF ARIZONA. Read the opinion of the Court — 82 F.4th 863
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 9, 2022·No. 20-15568·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DEC 9 2022 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MACKENZIE BROWN, a single woman, No. 20-15568

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:17-cv-03536-GMS District of Arizona, v. Phoenix

STATE OF ARIZONA; ARIZONA BOARD ORDER OF REGENTS, DBA University of Arizona, a constitutionally created body corporate,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

RICHARD A. RODRIQUEZ; RITA RODRIQUEZ,

Defendants,

v.

LIDA DEGROOTE,

Third-party-plaintiff.

MURGUIA, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MACKENZIE BROWN V. STATE OF ARIZONA, (9th Cir. 2022).

MACKENZIE BROWN V. STATE OF ARIZONA (MACKENZIE BROWN V. STATE OF ARIZONA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.