MACKENSON CHERISME v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of MACKENSON CHERISME v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA (MACKENSON CHERISME v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed December 29, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D21-1914 Lower Tribunal No. F16-11280A ________________
Mackenson Cherisme, Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida, Appellee.
An appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jose L. Fernandez, Judge.
Mackenson Cherisme, in proper person.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Sandra Lipman, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before SCALES, HENDON, and MILLER, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See State v. Gray, 633 So. 2d 105 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994);
Woods v. State, 314 So. 3d 683 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
MACKENSON CHERISME v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mackenson-cherisme-v-the-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2021.