Macken v. City of Waterbury
273 U.S. 646, 47 S. Ct. 244
This text of 273 U.S. 646 (Macken v. City of Waterbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Macken v. City of Waterbury, 273 U.S. 646, 47 S. Ct. 244 (1926).
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Pacific States Telephone Co. v. Oregon, 223 U. S. 118; (2) Farrell v. O'Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580, 583; Piedmont Power and Light Co. v. Town of Graham, 253 U. S. 193, 195; Seaboard Air Line v. Padgett, 236 U. S. 668, 671.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Farrell v. O'Brien
199 U.S. 89 (Supreme Court, 1905)
Pacific States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Oregon
223 U.S. 118 (Supreme Court, 1912)
Seaboard Air Line Railway v. Padgett
236 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Toop v. Ulysses Land Co.
237 U.S. 580 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Town of Graham
253 U.S. 193 (Supreme Court, 1920)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
273 U.S. 646, 47 S. Ct. 244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/macken-v-city-of-waterbury-scotus-1926.