Macken v. City of Waterbury
273 U.S. 646, 47 S. Ct. 244
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Pacific States Telephone Co. v. Oregon, 223 U. S. 118; (2) Farrell v. O'Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580, 583; Piedmont Power and Light Co. v. Town of Graham, 253 U. S. 193, 195; Seaboard Air Line v. Padgett, 236 U. S. 668, 671.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Macken v. City of Waterbury, 273 U.S. 646, 47 S. Ct. 244 (1926).
273 U.S. 646 (Macken v. City of Waterbury) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Farrell v. O'Brien
199 U.S. 89 (Supreme Court, 1905)
Pacific States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Oregon
223 U.S. 118 (Supreme Court, 1912)
Seaboard Air Line Railway v. Padgett
236 U.S. 668 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Toop v. Ulysses Land Co.
237 U.S. 580 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Town of Graham
253 U.S. 193 (Supreme Court, 1920)