Macke v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Macke v. State

282 S.W.3d 887, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 602, 2009 WL 1289209

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 12, 2009·No. No. ED 91900·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Victory Macke (Movant), pro se, appeals from the motion court’s judgment granting the State’s motion to dismiss Movant’s amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct the Judgment or Sentence.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We affirm the motion court’s judgment, pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Victory Macke (Movant), pro se, appeals from the motion court’s judgment granting the State’s motion to dismiss Movant’s amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct the Judgment or Sentence.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We affirm the motion court’s judgment, pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Macke v. State, 282 S.W.3d 887, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 602, 2009 WL 1289209 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

282 S.W.3d 887 (Macke v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.