Macke v. State

887 S.W.2d 781, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1827, 1994 WL 663368
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Macke v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 2004
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 29, 1994·No. No. 65808·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Victory Macke, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgments of the circuit court are based on findings of fact and conclusions of law that are not clearly erroneous. Appellant was properly charged as a persistent offender for felony driving while intoxicated pursuant to RSMo § 577.023 (1986). The Western District’s decision in State v. Conz, 756 S.W.2d 543 (Mo.App.W.D.1988), controls here. As we further find an extended opinion would have no prec-edential value, we affirm the circuit court’s judgment pursuant to Rules 84.16(b) and 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Macke v. State, 887 S.W.2d 781, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1827, 1994 WL 663368 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

887 S.W.2d 781 (Macke v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Conz
756 S.W.2d 543 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1988)