MacKay v. Rafferty
This text of 321 F. Supp. 1177 (MacKay v. Rafferty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ORDER GRANTING INJUNC-TIVE RELIEF
This action attacks the constitutionality of California Education Code § 13121, which provides that no person may be certified as a teacher in the public schools of the State of California unless he has subscribed to a “loyalty oath”, the terms of which are set forth below.1 The oath is attacked on the grounds discussed in Baggett v. Bullitt, 377 U.S. 360, 84 S.Ct. 1316, 12 L.Ed.2d 377 (1964). A three-judge court was appointed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2281.
The Court, having heard oral argument and considered the briefs herein, finds the oath promulgated by § 13121 to be essentially indistinguishable from the one declared unconstitutional in Baggett. The Court thus feels itself foreclosed from considering the arguments advanced by the State.
Accordingly, the Court declares the above cited statute unconstitutional and hereby orders that defendants be preliminarily and permanently enjoined from [1178]*1178enforcing, directly or indirectly, the provisions of California Education Code § 13121.
The damages claim herein is hereby remanded, for decision on the merits, to the district court judge to whom it was originally assigned.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
321 F. Supp. 1177, 1970 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mackay-v-rafferty-cand-1970.