Mackay, Lovell & Co. v. Dillon

215 A.D. 842
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1926·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Order denying motion of defendant Dillon, Sr., to vacate notice of examination before trial reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. We think the examination sought should be deferred until after the service of the answer of the codefendant upon the appellant, pursuant to Civil Practice Act, section 264. Until service of such answer, and issue joined, [843] the appellant cannot be said to be an adverse party. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Manning, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mackay, Lovell & Co. v. Dillon, 215 A.D. 842 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).

215 A.D. 842 (Mackay, Lovell & Co. v. Dillon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Probate of the Will of Beck
11 Misc. 2d 31 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1958)
In re the Probate of the Will of Baum
7 Misc. 2d 937 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1957)
Punia v. Dry Dock Savings Bank
280 A.D. 431 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1952)
In re the Probate of the Will of Carll
201 Misc. 829 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1951)
Parodis v. Hearn Department Stores, Inc.
178 Misc. 191 (New York Supreme Court, 1942)
Grennan v. Coles
230 A.D. 728 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1930)