Mackall v. Goszler

16 F. Cas. 155, 2 D.C. 240, 2 Cranch 240

This text of 16 F. Cas. 155 (Mackall v. Goszler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mackall v. Goszler, 16 F. Cas. 155, 2 D.C. 240, 2 Cranch 240 (circtddc 1821).

Opinion

The Court,

(Thruston, J., absent,)

at the prayer of the defendant’s counsel, instructed the jury, that, if they should be satisfied, by the evidence, that the defendant, when he drew the said check, had a reasonable expectation that funds would be placed in the said bank, by Fitzhugh, to meet the check, and that such expectation was known to the plaintiff when the said check was presented to the bank for payment, then the defendant was entitled to regular notice of the non-payment thereof by the bank.

Verdict for the defendant. The plaintiff moved for a new trial upon the ground of misdirection of the jury, by the Court, upon the matter of law — and of newly discovered evidence — but the motion was overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 F. Cas. 155, 2 D.C. 240, 2 Cranch 240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mackall-v-goszler-circtddc-1821.