Mack v. Turner
This text of 696 F. App'x 653 (Mack v. Turner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Bennie Austin Mack, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil action for failure to prosecute and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Mack v. Turner, No. 5:15-cv-03589, 2017 WL 870414 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 3, 2017). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with [654]*654oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
696 F. App'x 653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mack-v-turner-ca4-2017.