Mack v. Turner

Fourth Circuit

Mack v. Turner

696 F. App'x 653

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 28, 2017·No. No. 17-6337·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bennie Austin Mack, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil action for failure to prosecute and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Mack v. Turner, No. 5:15-cv-03589, 2017 WL 870414 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 3, 2017). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with [654] oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bennie Austin Mack, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil action for failure to prosecute and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Mack v. Turner, No. 5:15-cv-03589, 2017 WL 870414 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 3, 2017). We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with [654] oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Mack v. Turner, 696 F. App'x 653 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

696 F. App'x 653 (Mack v. Turner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.