Mack v. Travelers Protective Ass'n

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mack v. Travelers Protective Ass'n

261 A.D. 502, 26 N.Y.S.2d 9, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7368

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 21, 1941·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In view of the convincing evidence of suicide, errors, including any error in admitting the exclamation of the witness Sarah Bond as part of the res gestee, may be disregarded upon the ground that they did not affect the result. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 106.)

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Present — Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In view of the convincing evidence of suicide, errors, including any error in admitting the exclamation of the witness Sarah Bond as part of the res gestee, may be disregarded upon the ground that they did not affect the result. (Civ. Prac. Act, § 106.)

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

Present — Martin, P. J., Untermyer, Dore, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Mack v. Travelers Protective Ass'n, 261 A.D. 502, 26 N.Y.S.2d 9, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7368 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

261 A.D. 502 (Mack v. Travelers Protective Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.