Mack v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Mack v. State

164 S.E.2d 241, 118 Ga. App. 438, 1968 Ga. App. LEXIS 945

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 16, 1968

Docket43825

StatusPublished

This text of 164 S.E.2d 241 (Mack v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mack v. State, 164 S.E.2d 241, 118 Ga. App. 438, 1968 Ga. App. LEXIS 945 (Ga. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Hall, Judge.

Appellant was convicted on two accusations (1) for operating and maintaining a gambling game, and (2) for unlawfully carrying a pistol. He appealed to this court solely on the grounds that both criminal statutes under which he was convicted are unconstitutional. For this reason the appeal was transferred to the Supreme Court which held that the appellant failed in his attempt to raise these constitutional issues. Mack v. State, 224 Ga. 352 (161 SE2d 874). However, instead of affirming the judgment, the Supreme Court returned the case to this court. There being nothing left for this court to rule upon, we affirm.

Judgment affirmed.

Bell, P. J., and Quillian, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hall, Judge.

Appellant was convicted on two accusations (1) for operating and maintaining a gambling game, and (2) for unlawfully carrying a pistol. He appealed to this court solely on the grounds that both criminal statutes under which he was convicted are unconstitutional. For this reason the appeal was transferred to the Supreme Court which held that the appellant failed in his attempt to raise these constitutional issues. Mack v. State, 224 Ga. 352 (161 SE2d 874). However, instead of affirming the judgment, the Supreme Court returned the case to this court. There being nothing left for this court to rule upon, we affirm.

Judgment affirmed.

Bell, P. J., and Quillian, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

164 S.E.2d 241, 118 Ga. App. 438, 1968 Ga. App. LEXIS 945, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mack-v-state-gactapp-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack