Mack v. State

149 S.E. 170, 40 Ga. App. 135, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 45
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJuly 9, 1929
Docket19749
StatusPublished

This text of 149 S.E. 170 (Mack v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mack v. State, 149 S.E. 170, 40 Ga. App. 135, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 45 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The evidence tending to connect the accused with the offense charged was circumstantial, and, while raising a suspicion of his guilt, was not sufficient to authorize his conviction.

Judgment reversed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur. Stephens & Kea,, for plaintiff in error. Fred Kea, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
149 S.E. 170, 40 Ga. App. 135, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 45, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mack-v-state-gactapp-1929.