MacK v. State

59 So. 3d 325, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 5634, 2011 WL 1485312
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in MacK v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2 So. 3d 267
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 20, 2011·No. 4D10-684·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. As to ground one, see Solorzano v. State, 25 So.3d 19 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); as to ground two, see Bryant v. State, 901 So.2d 810, 821-22 (Fla.2005); Corp v. Sec., Fla. Dept. of Corr., 2010 WL 3469506 at *13 (M.D.Fla. Aug. 31, 2010); as to ground three, see Zack v. State, 911 So.2d 1190, 1198 n. 3 (Fla.2005).

TAYLOR, CIKLIN and GERBER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MacK v. State, 59 So. 3d 325, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 5634, 2011 WL 1485312 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

59 So. 3d 325 (MacK v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Solorzano v. State
25 So. 3d 19 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Bryant v. State
901 So. 2d 810 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)
Zack v. State
30 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 591 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2005)