Mack v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Mack v. State

886 So. 2d 416, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 17291, 2004 WL 2579597

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 15, 2004

DocketNo. 1D03-4713

StatusPublished

This text of 886 So. 2d 416 (Mack v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mack v. State, 886 So. 2d 416, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 17291, 2004 WL 2579597 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

WOLF, C.J.

In this direct criminal appeal, we reverse appellant’s designation as a prison releasee reoffender and an habitual felony offender, remand to the trial court to strike one of these designations, and to resentence the appellant. See Grant v. State, 770 So.2d 655, 659 (Fla.2000) (citing with approval Walls v. State, 765 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)); Lewis v. State, 819 So.2d 1009, 1010 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). Appellant’s conviction is affirmed.

BENTON and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WOLF, C.J.

In this direct criminal appeal, we reverse appellant’s designation as a prison releasee reoffender and an habitual felony offender, remand to the trial court to strike one of these designations, and to resentence the appellant. See Grant v. State, 770 So.2d 655, 659 (Fla.2000) (citing with approval Walls v. State, 765 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)); Lewis v. State, 819 So.2d 1009, 1010 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). Appellant’s conviction is affirmed.

BENTON and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

886 So. 2d 416, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 17291, 2004 WL 2579597, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mack-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack