Mack v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Mack v. State

74 So. 522, 73 Fla. 476

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedFebruary 24, 1917

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 74 So. 522 (Mack v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mack v. State, 74 So. 522, 73 Fla. 476 (Fla. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Whitfield, J.

Mack was sentenced to life imprisonment on a conviction of rape with a recommendation to [477]*477mercy. On writ of error it is contended that errors were committed in various rulings in admitting and rejecting testimony. As there is ample evidence to sustain the verdict and as the rulings complained of could not have been harmful in view of the entire proceedings, the technical errors if any will not warrant a reversal. Stone v. State, 71 Fla. 514, 71 South. Rep. 634.

The accused testified that he did not commit rape, but there was testimony of a confession by him that he did rob the victim, taking money from her stocking. The confession was extra judicial and a preponderance of the evidence shows it was voluntary. There is positive testimony of the victim identifying the accused and that “he knocked me down and dragged me in the bushes.” “He just choked me until I lost consciousness.- I don’t know what happened after that.” He was “on top of me choking me. That’s all I remember.” “Q. Did he have intercourse with you?” “A. I don’t know. I was unconscious. I don’t know anything about it.” “I am sure that (accused) is the man because I had a good view.of his face when he had me on the ground. He was on top of me.” “It was not dark.” “Q. You can’t say that he committed rape upon you then because you were unconscious?” “A. Yes, I was unconscious.” “My clothes were up when the people found me.” “I was down on my back.” “Q. If he had intercourse with you, did you consent to it?” /‘A. Why certainly not.” “Q. If he did it, did he do it by force and against your will ?”' “A. He certainly did.” The jury were warranted in finding from the testimony of the victim and the corroborative evidence which was adduced as to her-physical condition just after the alleged- assault, that rape was committed. A careful consideration of the entire record discloses that the defendant’s rights were dutifully guarded at the trial [478]*478by his counsel, and that no errors were committed that prejudice the rights of the accused. Mack v. State, 54 Fla. 55, 44 South. Rep. 706. The conviction was had in due course of law and the judgment is affirmed.

Taylor, Shackleford and Ellis, JJ., concur.

Browne, C. J. dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Whitfield, J.

Mack was sentenced to life imprisonment on a conviction of rape with a recommendation to [477]*477mercy. On writ of error it is contended that errors were committed in various rulings in admitting and rejecting testimony. As there is ample evidence to sustain the verdict and as the rulings complained of could not have been harmful in view of the entire proceedings, the technical errors if any will not warrant a reversal. Stone v. State, 71 Fla. 514, 71 South. Rep. 634.

The accused testified that he did not commit rape, but there was testimony of a confession by him that he did rob the victim, taking money from her stocking. The confession was extra judicial and a preponderance of the evidence shows it was voluntary. There is positive testimony of the victim identifying the accused and that “he knocked me down and dragged me in the bushes.” “He just choked me until I lost consciousness.- I don’t know what happened after that.” He was “on top of me choking me. That’s all I remember.” “Q. Did he have intercourse with you?” “A. I don’t know. I was unconscious. I don’t know anything about it.” “I am sure that (accused) is the man because I had a good view.of his face when he had me on the ground. He was on top of me.” “It was not dark.” “Q. You can’t say that he committed rape upon you then because you were unconscious?” “A. Yes, I was unconscious.” “My clothes were up when the people found me.” “I was down on my back.” “Q. If he had intercourse with you, did you consent to it?” /‘A. Why certainly not.” “Q. If he did it, did he do it by force and against your will ?”' “A. He certainly did.” The jury were warranted in finding from the testimony of the victim and the corroborative evidence which was adduced as to her-physical condition just after the alleged- assault, that rape was committed. A careful consideration of the entire record discloses that the defendant’s rights were dutifully guarded at the trial [478]*478by his counsel, and that no errors were committed that prejudice the rights of the accused. Mack v. State, 54 Fla. 55, 44 South. Rep. 706. The conviction was had in due course of law and the judgment is affirmed.

Taylor, Shackleford and Ellis, JJ., concur.

Browne, C. J. dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 So. 522, 73 Fla. 476, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mack-v-state-fla-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack