Mack v. Osteen

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 5, 2009
Docket09-6218
StatusUnpublished

This text of Mack v. Osteen (Mack v. Osteen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mack v. Osteen, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6218

BENNIE A. MACK, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, JR., in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as Federal District Court Judge for the Middle District of North Carolina; KAREN L. NENSTEIL, in her individual capacity and in her official capacity as a former agent for the North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation; ROBERT M. HAMILTON, in his individual and in his official capacity as an Assistant United States Attorney; JOSEPH M. WILSON, JR., in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as a practicing attorney and partner in the Law Firm of “Merritt Flebotte Wilson Webb & Carusso PLLC; PAUL TREVOR SHARP, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as a Federal Magistrate Judge for the Middle District of North Carolina; JUDGE WALLACE W. DIXON, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as a Federal Magistrate Judge for the Middle District of North Carolina; ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as United States Attorney General; ANNA MILLS WAGONER, in her individual capacity and in her official capacity as United States Attorney for the Middle District of North Carolina; FRANK J. CHUT, JR., in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as Assistant United States Attorney for the Middle District of North Carolina; ROBIN PENDERGRAFT, in her individual capacity and in her official capacity as Director of the North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation; NC ATTORNEY GENERAL ROY COOPER, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as North Carolina Attorney General; KEVIN SNEAD, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as an agent for the North Carolina State Bureau of Investigation,

Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:08-cv-00776-NCT-RAE)

Submitted: April 23, 2009 Decided: May 5, 2009

Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bennie A. Mack, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Anthony Paul Giorno, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, Gill Paul Beck, Sr., Robert Michael Hamilton, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Bennie A. Mack, Jr., appeals the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that

this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal

for the reasons stated by the district court. Mack v. Osteen,

No. 1:08-cv-00776-NCT-RAE (M.D.N.C. Jan. 30, 2009). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 1915A
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Mack v. Osteen, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mack-v-osteen-ca4-2009.