Mack v. Osteen

Fourth Circuit

Mack v. Osteen

325 F. App'x 169

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 5, 2009·No. No. 09-6218·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Bennie A. Mack, Jr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Mack v. Osteen, No. 1:08-cv-00776-NCT-RAE (M.D.N.C. Jan. [170]*17030, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Bennie A. Mack, Jr., appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Mack v. Osteen, No. 1:08-cv-00776-NCT-RAE (M.D.N.C. Jan. [170]*17030, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Mack v. Osteen, 325 F. App'x 169 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

325 F. App'x 169 (Mack v. Osteen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related