Mack v. Liebert

Fourth Circuit

Mack v. Liebert

444 F. App'x 676

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 30, 2011·No. No. 11-6858·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John Willie Mack, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Mack v. Liebert, No. 7:10-cv-02372-DCN, 2011 WL 2457354 (D.S.C. June 16, 2011 & June 17, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John Willie Mack, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Mack v. Liebert, No. 7:10-cv-02372-DCN, 2011 WL 2457354 (D.S.C. June 16, 2011 & June 17, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Mack v. Liebert, 444 F. App'x 676 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

444 F. App'x 676 (Mack v. Liebert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related