Mack v. Fortier

29 La. Ann. 63
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedFebruary 15, 1877
DocketNo. 5141
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 29 La. Ann. 63 (Mack v. Fortier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mack v. Fortier, 29 La. Ann. 63 (La. 1877).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Spencer, J.

This is a suit against Charles E. Fortier as maker and John Sbisa as indorser of a*promissory note. The defense is a general denial by both defendants.'

’ Upon trial there was judgment for plaintiff against both defendants in solido.

Defendants moved for a new trial, on the ground that the 'judgment •erroneously condemned them in solidó. The motion was refused, and defendants took this suspensive appeal. , . , ' .

The maker and indorser each owe the whole amount of a negotiable [64]*64promissory note to the holder, and he may pursue either or both for the whole. This may not be technically a solidary, obligation, but plain-’ tiff was entitled to a judgment against each of them for the entire debt,, and that end is secured and expressed by the words ‘‘ judgment insólido.”

No damages are asked for frivolous appeal.

The judgment is affirmed with costs in both courts.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Seelig v. Brusso
121 So. 2d 28 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 La. Ann. 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mack-v-fortier-la-1877.