Mack v. Edell

284 A.D. 1022, 134 N.Y.S.2d 844, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4396
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 10, 1954
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 284 A.D. 1022 (Mack v. Edell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mack v. Edell, 284 A.D. 1022, 134 N.Y.S.2d 844, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4396 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).

Opinion

Order reversed on the law and facts, without costs of this appeal to any party and plaintiff’s motion denied, without costs. Memorandum: There [1023]*1023is nothing in the record indicating that defendant Edell’s failure to appear for examination was that willful failure contemplated by the statute (Civ. Prae. Act, § 299) which permits the striking of his answer. That the order so doing was conditional does not cure the fact that appellant’s conduct was such that there was nothing upon which a court might exercise its discretion. All concur. (Appeal from an order striking out the answer of defendant Edell and directing judgment by default unless said defendant appears for examination before trial, in an action by a judgment creditor to set aside conveyances of realty by defendant Edell.) Present — Vaughan, J. P., Kimball, Piper, Wheeler and Van Duser, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stockman v. Marks Polarized Corp.
25 A.D.2d 883 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1966)
Murphy v. Solomon
22 Misc. 2d 857 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
Adamo v. Pennsylvania Railroad
20 Misc. 2d 167 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)
Kallus v. Sadacca
6 A.D.2d 815 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
284 A.D. 1022, 134 N.Y.S.2d 844, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mack-v-edell-nyappdiv-1954.