Mack v. Eason Law Firm, LLC

Missouri Court of Appeals

Mack v. Eason Law Firm, LLC

482 S.W.3d 430, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1177, 2015 WL 7253022

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 17, 2015

DocketED 102942

StatusPublished

This text of 482 S.W.3d 430 (Mack v. Eason Law Firm, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mack v. Eason Law Firm, LLC, 482 S.W.3d 430, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1177, 2015 WL 7253022 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Angela Mack, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated (Appellant), appeals from the trial court’s order denying her Amended Motion for Class Certification. 'We have'reviéwed the briéfs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Appellant class certification. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri .Rule of Givil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Angela Mack, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated (Appellant), appeals from the trial court’s order denying her Amended Motion for Class Certification. 'We have'reviéwed the briéfs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Appellant class certification. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri .Rule of Givil Procedure 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

482 S.W.3d 430, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 1177, 2015 WL 7253022, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mack-v-eason-law-firm-llc-moctapp-2015.