Mack v. Brown

73 Ill. 295
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 15, 1874
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 73 Ill. 295 (Mack v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mack v. Brown, 73 Ill. 295 (Ill. 1874).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Scholfield

delivered the opinion of the Court:

The return of the sheriff, showing service on Firman K. Mack, one of the minor defendants, is in these words: “And on Firman K. Mack, by leaving a true copy thereof for him with Adelia Mack, at his usual place of abode, she being a white person, over ten years of-age, the 20th of September, 1872.” This was insufficient to give the court jurisdiction to render any decree affecting his interests, because the return fails to show that Adelia Mack, with whom the copy of the summons was left, was a person of the family, and that she was informed of the contents of the copy, as required by the statute. 1 Gross, 70, sec. 7.

The decree was, therefore, void as against Firman K. Mack, and being a joint decree against all the defendants, must be reversed in toto. Montgomery v. Brown et al. 2 Gilm. 581; Tompkims v. Wiltberger, 56 Ill. 385.

The decree is reversed and the cause remanded.

Decree reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McCormick v. Blaine
178 N.E. 195 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 Ill. 295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mack-v-brown-ill-1874.