Mack v. Anderson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mack v. Anderson. Read the opinion of the Court — 2021 MT 25
Montana Supreme Court·Decided September 28, 2020·No. DA 19-0678·Unpublished

Opinion

09/28/2020

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Case Number: DA 19-0678

DA 19-0678 _________________

SUNSET IRRIGATION DISTRICT; CAROLYN R. MACK and CHRISS A. MACK,

Claimants and Appellees,

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (FISH AND ORDER WILDLIFE SERVICE); GLENDA F. ANDERSON; JIMMY A. ANDERSON; JOHN ANDERSON; ROWDY ANDERSON,

Objectors and Appellants. _________________

Counsel for Appellants has filed a motion for an extension of time to file the reply brief in the referenced matter. In his motion, counsel indicates the motion is for a 30-day extension but then requests a due date of November 29, 2020, which is 60 days. IT IS ORDERED that the motion for a 60-day extension is DENIED. Appellant has 30 days, or until October 29, 2020, within which to file the reply brief. No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court September 28 2020

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mack v. Anderson, (Mo. 2020).

Mack v. Anderson (Mack v. Anderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.