Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Lasater

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Lasater

127 S.E.2d 538, 257 N.C. 772, 1962 N.C. LEXIS 598

DecidedOctober 10, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 127 S.E.2d 538 (Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Lasater) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Lasater, 127 S.E.2d 538, 257 N.C. 772, 1962 N.C. LEXIS 598 (N.C. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The parties stipulated the vehicle was reasonably worth $3,000 on November 14, 1960. The plaintiff introduced evidence the reasonable market value shortly before the seizure was $5,500. Apparently the defendant’s son had been permitted to replevy the vehicle and retain possession until November 14, 1960. The defendant did not offer evidence. There is nothing in the record to indicate the vehicle was damaged or that its value changed other than by ordinary depreciation. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict. The record disclosed

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The parties stipulated the vehicle was reasonably worth $3,000 on November 14, 1960. The plaintiff introduced evidence the reasonable market value shortly before the seizure was $5,500. Apparently the defendant’s son had been permitted to replevy the vehicle and retain possession until November 14, 1960. The defendant did not offer evidence. There is nothing in the record to indicate the vehicle was damaged or that its value changed other than by ordinary depreciation. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict. The record disclosed

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

127 S.E.2d 538, 257 N.C. 772, 1962 N.C. LEXIS 598, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mack-trucks-inc-v-lasater-nc-1962.