Mack Markowitz Oldsmobile, Inc. v. State Division of Human Rights

271 A.D.2d 690, 707 N.Y.S.2d 865, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4514
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 24, 2000
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 271 A.D.2d 690 (Mack Markowitz Oldsmobile, Inc. v. State Division of Human Rights) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mack Markowitz Oldsmobile, Inc. v. State Division of Human Rights, 271 A.D.2d 690, 707 N.Y.S.2d 865, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4514 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Commissioner of the New York State Division of Human Rights, dated September 30, 1998, which found that the petitioner engaged in unlawful discriminatory practices by terminating the employment of the complainants because of their age, and awarded damages.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.

Pursuant to Executive Law § 298, findings of fact made by the Commissioner of the New York State Division of Human Rights (hereinafter the Commissioner) are to be regarded as conclusive “if supported by sufficient evidence on the record considered as a whole”. In reviewing the Commissioner’s findings, we are limited to a determination of whether they are supported by substantial evidence (see, 300 Gramatan Ave. Assocs. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176), and are precluded from passing upon the credibility of the witnesses at the administrative hearing (see, Matter of Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436). After considering the record as a whole, we find that the Commissioner’s determination that the petitioner terminated the employment of the complainants because of their age is supported by substantial evidence.

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Santucci, J. P., Joy, Sullivan and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of All Is. Airport Servs., Inc. v. New York State Div. of Human Rights
127 A.D.3d 967 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Matter of HP Ronkonkoma, Inc. v. Kirkland
122 A.D.3d 737 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Truss v. Westchester County Health Care Corp.
301 A.D.2d 607 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
271 A.D.2d 690, 707 N.Y.S.2d 865, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4514, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mack-markowitz-oldsmobile-inc-v-state-division-of-human-rights-nyappdiv-2000.