Mack, Jr. v. Shepard

S.D. New York

Mack, Jr. v. Shepard

DecidedOctober 24, 2022

Docket1:22-cv-08950

StatusUnknown

This text of Mack, Jr. v. Shepard (Mack, Jr. v. Shepard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mack, Jr. v. Shepard, (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK wee KX JOSEPH MACK, Jr. and ANASTASIA RIVERA, : Plaintiffs, : : 22 Civ. 8950 (JPC) -v- : : ORDER WILLIAM SHEPARD and BOYD TRANSPORT, LLC: Defendants. : wee KX JOHN P. CRONAN, United States District Judge: All parties shall appear for a conference before the undersigned on November 1, 2022, at 11:00 a.m. The Court will conduct the conference via telephone. At the scheduled time, the parties should call (866) 434-5269, access code 9176261. Defendants should be prepared to address why jurisdiction is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, including why the amount-in-controversy threshold for diversity jurisdiction is met. See Mehlenbacher v. Akzo Nobel Salt, Inc., 216 F.3d 291, 296 (2d Cir. 2000) (“The Supreme Court has long held that separate and distinct claims raised by different plaintiffs may not be aggregated to satisfy the jurisdictional amount in controversy.” (citing Snyder v. Harris, 394 U.S. 332, 336 (1969))). SO ORDERED. Dated: October 24, 2022 _ eB New York, New York JOHN P. CRONAN United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK wee KX JOSEPH MACK, Jr. and ANASTASIA RIVERA, : Plaintiffs, : : 22 Civ. 8950 (JPC) -v- : : ORDER WILLIAM SHEPARD and BOYD TRANSPORT, LLC: Defendants. : wee KX JOHN P. CRONAN, United States District Judge: All parties shall appear for a conference before the undersigned on November 1, 2022, at 11:00 a.m. The Court will conduct the conference via telephone. At the scheduled time, the parties should call (866) 434-5269, access code 9176261. Defendants should be prepared to address why jurisdiction is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, including why the amount-in-controversy threshold for diversity jurisdiction is met. See Mehlenbacher v. Akzo Nobel Salt, Inc., 216 F.3d 291, 296 (2d Cir. 2000) (“The Supreme Court has long held that separate and distinct claims raised by different plaintiffs may not be aggregated to satisfy the jurisdictional amount in controversy.” (citing Snyder v. Harris, 394 U.S. 332, 336 (1969))). SO ORDERED. Dated: October 24, 2022 _ eB New York, New York JOHN P. CRONAN United States District Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Mack, Jr. v. Shepard, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mack-jr-v-shepard-nysd-2022.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack