MACK, JOSHUA L., PEOPLE v

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 21, 2014
DocketKA 12-01625
StatusPublished

This text of MACK, JOSHUA L., PEOPLE v (MACK, JOSHUA L., PEOPLE v) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MACK, JOSHUA L., PEOPLE v, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1252 KA 12-01625 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOSHUA L. MACK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

ERICKSON WEBB SCOLTON & HAJDU, LAKEWOOD (LYLE T. HAJDU OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

DAVID W. FOLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, MAYVILLE (ANDREW M. MOLITOR OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Chautauqua County Court (John T. Ward, J.), rendered April 23, 2012. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree (two counts).

It is hereby ORDERED that the case is held, the decision is reserved and the matter is remitted to Chautauqua County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his guilty plea of two counts of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree (Penal Law § 220.09 [1]). Contrary to defendant’s contention, the sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. We agree with defendant, however, that County Court failed to rule on his oral motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Contrary to the People’s contention, we cannot “deem the court’s failure to rule on the . . . motion as a denial thereof” (People v Spratley, 96 AD3d 1420, 1421; see People v Concepcion, 17 NY3d 192, 197-198). We therefore hold the case, reserve decision and remit the matter to County Court to determine defendant’s motion.

Entered: November 21, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Concepcion
953 N.E.2d 779 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)
People v. Spratley
96 A.D.3d 1420 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
MACK, JOSHUA L., PEOPLE v, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mack-joshua-l-people-v-nyappdiv-2014.