MacK B. Yates v. Harris County

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 31, 2017
Docket01-16-00086-CV
StatusPublished

This text of MacK B. Yates v. Harris County (MacK B. Yates v. Harris County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MacK B. Yates v. Harris County, (Tex. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Mack B. Yates v. Harris County

Appellate case number: 01-16-00086-CV

Trial court case number: 2014-67727

Trial court: 113th District Court of Harris County

On December 1, 2016, this Court dismissed appellant Mack B. Yates’s motions for the appellate record be filed without cost as moot because (1) we issued an order directing the record to be filed without cost and (2) the clerk’s record was filed on November 4, 2016 and the reporter sent an information sheet stating that a reporter’s record was not taken. A copy of the record was sent to appellant by overnight mail on November 29, 2016. Appellant subsequently filed a “letter motion” claiming that the record is incomplete and requesting that we (1) “set aside” our order dismissing his motions as moot, (2) “reorder the clerk and reporter to file a complete record,” and (3) extend the time to file his appellate brief until the requested records are provided. We deny appellant’s requests to withdraw our prior order and to reorder the clerk and reporter to file the record in this appeal. The clerk’s record on file and the reporter’s statement that a reporter’s record was not taken appear to be the complete record in this case. If appellant believes the record to be inaccurate, he may request supplementation of the record by letter to the trial court clerk and/or request in his appellant’s brief a correction of any particular perceived inaccuracy. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.5(c)(1); 34.6(e)(2). We grant appellant an extension of 30 days from the date of this order to file his appellate brief. No further extensions will be entertained absent extraordinary circumstances. It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Rebeca Huddle Acting individually

Date: January 31, 2017

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
MacK B. Yates v. Harris County, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mack-b-yates-v-harris-county-texapp-2017.