Mack Arthur White v. S. Jones, Major Louise C. Davis

Fourth Circuit

Mack Arthur White v. S. Jones, Major Louise C. Davis

48 F.3d 1218, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 10979, 1995 WL 88929

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 6, 1995

Docket94-6788

StatusPublished

This text of 48 F.3d 1218 (Mack Arthur White v. S. Jones, Major Louise C. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mack Arthur White v. S. Jones, Major Louise C. Davis, 48 F.3d 1218, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 10979, 1995 WL 88929 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

48 F.3d 1218
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Mack Arthur WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
S. JONES, Major; Louise C. Davis, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-6788.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 16, 1995.
Decided March 6, 1995.

Mack Arthur White, Appellant pro se.

Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for Appellees.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the magistrate judge's order* denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the magistrate judge's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. White v. Jones, No. CA-93-577-R (W.D.Va. June 20, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(c)(2) (1988)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

48 F.3d 1218
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Mack Arthur WHITE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
S. JONES, Major; Louise C. Davis, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-6788.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 16, 1995.
Decided March 6, 1995.

Mack Arthur White, Appellant pro se.

Pamela Anne Sargent, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for Appellees.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the magistrate judge's order* denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the magistrate judge's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. White v. Jones, No. CA-93-577-R (W.D.Va. June 20, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(c)(2) (1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 F.3d 1218, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 10979, 1995 WL 88929, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mack-arthur-white-v-s-jones-major-louise-c-davis-ca4-1995.