MacIvor v. Schwartzman
234 A.D. 699
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 15, 1931
StatusPublished
This text of 234 A.D. 699 (MacIvor v. Schwartzman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
MacIvor v. Schwartzman, 234 A.D. 699 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).
Opinion
Motion to dismiss appeal denied upon the ground that there is no dispute that the moving attorney has not been duly substituted as attorney for the defendants, respondents. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
234 A.D. 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/macivor-v-schwartzman-nyappdiv-1931.