Macintosh v. Henrici

Oregon Supreme Court

Macintosh v. Henrici

31 P. 201, 23 Or. 143, 1892 Ore. LEXIS 117

DecidedOctober 17, 1892

StatusPublished

This text of 31 P. 201 (Macintosh v. Henrici) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Macintosh v. Henrici, 31 P. 201, 23 Or. 143, 1892 Ore. LEXIS 117 (Or. 1892).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is a suit in equity brought to recover a violin, alleged in the complaint to have been purchased from the respondent by the appellant, who it is charged effected the purchase at an inadequate price by fraudulent representations. The objection is raised that respondent had a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy at law. The view we take of this case renders a consideration of the question of jurisdiction unnecessary, as the evidence, in our judgment, is insufficient to sustain the allegations of the complaint. The decree will be reversed and plaintiff’s complaint dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is a suit in equity brought to recover a violin, alleged in the complaint to have been purchased from the respondent by the appellant, who it is charged effected the purchase at an inadequate price by fraudulent representations. The objection is raised that respondent had a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy at law. The view we take of this case renders a consideration of the question of jurisdiction unnecessary, as the evidence, in our judgment, is insufficient to sustain the allegations of the complaint. The decree will be reversed and plaintiff’s complaint dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 P. 201, 23 Or. 143, 1892 Ore. LEXIS 117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/macintosh-v-henrici-or-1892.