Macias v. U.S. District Court Judge Kari A Dooley

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided August 14, 2024·No. 2:24-cv-00483·Unknown

Opinion

CARLOS A. MACIAS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Case No.: 2:24-cv-00483-GMN-BNW vs. ) ) ORDER ADOPTING U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE KARI A. ) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DOOLEY, et. al., ) ) Defendants. ) Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), (ECF No. 9), from United States Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler, which recommends dismissing Plaintiff’s complaint without leave to amend because Nevada is not the proper venue for his case. A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a United States Magistrate Judge made pursuant to Local Rule IB 1-4. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); D. Nev. R. IB 3-2. Upon the filing of such objections, the Court must make a de novo determination of those portions to which objections are made if the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations concern matters that may not be finally determined by a magistrate judge. D. Nev. R. IB 3-2(b). The Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Nev. R. IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, the Court is not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection.” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized that a district court is not required to review a magistrate judge’s R&R where no objections have been filed. See, e.g., United States v. Reyna–Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1122 (9th Cir. 2003). Here, no objections were filed, and the deadline to do so has passed. (See R&R, ECF No. 9) (setting August 6, 2024, deadline for objections). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 9), is } ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. The Clerk of Court is kindly requested to close the case. Dated this 14 day of August, 2024. ‘yf, Yj, Z4 Yl Gloria M./Navarro, District Judge Unite i) tes District Court 1]

Page 2 of 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Macias v. U.S. District Court Judge Kari A Dooley, (D. Nev. 2024).

Macias v. U.S. District Court Judge Kari A Dooley (Macias v. U.S. District Court Judge Kari A Dooley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related