MacIas v Holder
This text of 476 F. App'x 656 (MacIas v Holder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Respondent’s petition for panel rehearing is granted. The memorandum disposition filed on June 9, 2010, is withdrawn and a superseding memorandum disposition will be filed concurrently with this order.
MEMORANDUM **
Reyna Macias, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Nunez-Reyes v. Holder, 646 F.3d 684, 688 (9th Cir.2011) *657 (en banc), and we deny the petition for review.
The BIA correctly determined that Federal First Offender Act (“FFOA”) treatment is not available for Macias’s “under the influence” conviction under Cal. Health & Safety Code § 11550(a). See Nunez-Reyes, 646 F.3d at 695 (FFOA exception not available for “under the influence” convictions). As a result, Macias is not eligible for cancellation of removal, see 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(l)(C), adjustment of status, see 8 U.S.C. §§ 1182(a)(2)(A)(i)(II) and 1255(a), or voluntary departure, see 8 U.S.C. § 1229c(b)(l)(B).
Macias has waived any challenge regarding the sufficiency of the conviction record. See Rizk v. Holder, 629 F.3d 1083, 1091 n. 4 (9th Cir.2011) (contentions not raised in the opening brief are deemed waived).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
476 F. App'x 656, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/macias-v-holder-ca9-2011.