Macias v. Dewitt County Texas

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT December 11, 2024 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Nathan Ochsner, Clerk CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION

MANUEL MACIAS, et al., § § Plaintiffs, § § VS. § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-CV-00043 § DEWITT COUNTY TEXAS, et al., § § Defendants. §

ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION

On October 17, 2024, United States Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby issued his Memorandum and Recommendation (D.E. 50), recommending that the Court deny Plaintiff’s Motion to Alter and Amend the Final Judgment (D.E. 47). The parties were provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge’s memorandum and recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-13. No objections have been timely filed. When no timely objection to a magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge’s memorandum and recommendation. Guillory v. PPG Indus., Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005) (citing Douglass v. United Servs. Auto Ass’n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996)). Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Magistrate Judge’s memorandum and recommendation (D.E. 50), and all other relevant documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the motion to alter or amend the judgment (D.E. 47) is DENIED. ORDERED on December 11, 2024. GONZAIGS RAMOS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2/2